Post by Tony DonePost by GitFiddlerI've got one here in a box of stuff. Meters at 8 ohms exactly. What
are the characteristics of the Super 70s? Would this be a neck pup at
that ohm value? Or is that a matter of taste?
I don't know anything about that particular pickup, but if it is an old
Ibanez, I would assume it is good enough to be worth the effort of trying
out. You would generally use a lower output pickup at the neck than at the
bridge, so this could be used either as a PAF style bridge pickup, or as a
neck pickup with a hot bridge pickup.
Some pickups have/had different pole spacings for the neck and bridge. You
could check that by comparing them with, say, a modern Seymour Duncan, which
will have the same pole spacing for neck and bridge. If it has wider poles
it would be better as a neck pickup, if narrower, as a bridge pickup.
However, I think that any failure of the poles to line up with the strings
will be small enough that it can be compensated by adjusting the pole
height, so that either type could be used in either position.
Tony D
I guess you mean the other way round Tony, if it has narrow pole pieces
itŽll be better for neck position and wider polepieces, better suited for
bridge position. But if itŽs a real super 70 it has narrow polepieces.
As Squier was telling you, the Super70 was an Ibanez copy of an old PAF. A
great pickup that works well in both bridge and neck position.
BTW, i hope it measures about 8 Kilo ohms, if it only measures 8 ohms, i
wouldnŽt bother install it:-)
Peter
<g> Oops, a couple of typos in there.
Disclaimer - ***All*** my posts have to be interpreted in the light of
possible senility-related errors. The absolute nonsense is easy to spot, but
some, such as the pole spacing mistake, is more subtle.
Tony D